Secondary suites investigation needed clarification – Sooke News Mirror
Urban Systems’ secondary suite process needs a major fix.
Question 11 of the 2014 Official Community Plan survey asked, “Do you agree or disagree with the inclusion of the following housing types in existing single-family residential areas?” Assume that key issues such as tree protection, parking, traffic, noise, and neighborhood character will be addressed. Based on the assumption, 69% agreed with regulated secondary suites in existing homes.
The stated objective of the May 2021 Urban Systems Secondary Community Apartment Survey (page 10) “is intended to identify the policies and regulations necessary to consider secondary suites as a form of housing within the community. “. However, this survey goes beyond this intention to say that secondary suites are “considered”.
Additionally, the summary of the Urban Systems Accessory Apartment Community Survey June 2021 (page 6) states: Suites should be allowed.
It is clear that the consultant who designed the survey did not read or understand the OCP survey or even the stated objective of his own company. This is a serious violation, if not a complete disregard, of the trust of the community.
This loophole would have been corrected if the board had had more than a day to review the questionnaire. Most advisers have said, unofficially, that they are very unhappy with what has happened.
To correct this violation, once the document (set of policies and regulations) is ready for everything except drafting associated necessary regulations etc., there should be a community survey with a two-part question. Residents might respond: (a) I am in favor of legalizing the suites. Key OCP issues such as tree protection, parking, traffic, noise and neighborhood character have been addressed. Or (b) I do not support the legalization of the suite. Key OCP issues were not addressed.
Bay of Oaks